Vendor Risk Assessment Procedure Free Template
Here is the full Vendor Risk Assessment Procedure document (PRC-ALL-002), aligned with SOC 2 Trust Criteria CC9.1 and CC9.2, and ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Controls A.5.19 (Supplier Relationships) and A.5.20 (Addressing Information Security in Supplier Agreements):
Published on June 24, 2025
Vendor Risk Assessment: Protecting Your Organization Through Strategic Partnerships
Every vendor relationship is a calculated risk. When you entrust third parties with your data, systems, or business processes, you're essentially extending your security perimeter beyond your direct control. A comprehensive vendor risk assessment procedure helps you make informed decisions about these partnerships while ensuring that vendors enhance rather than compromise your security posture.
Modern organizations rely on dozens or even hundreds of vendors - cloud providers, software vendors, professional services firms, suppliers, and contractors. Each relationship creates potential pathways for data breaches, service disruptions, compliance failures, and reputational damage. The challenge isn't avoiding vendor relationships altogether, but rather understanding and managing the risks they introduce.
The most successful organizations treat vendor risk assessment as a strategic capability that enables better partnerships while protecting organizational assets. Rather than viewing security requirements as barriers to vendor relationships, they use comprehensive risk assessment to identify vendors who can truly support their business objectives while maintaining appropriate security standards.
Understanding Compliance Framework Requirements
SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria CC9.1 requires that your organization identify and assess risks related to outsourced service providers that have access to your data or systems. This means systematically evaluating how vendor relationships might impact your ability to meet your own service commitments and security obligations.
CC9.2 focuses on implementing controls to address risks identified in vendor relationships. Your risk assessment procedure needs to drive actionable risk mitigation strategies rather than just documenting potential issues. This includes contractual protections, ongoing monitoring, and contingency planning for vendor-related disruptions.
ISO 27001 Control A.5.19 requires establishing and maintaining information security requirements for supplier relationships. This control emphasizes the need for systematic processes to ensure that vendors understand and comply with your security expectations throughout the relationship lifecycle.
Control A.5.20 addresses information security requirements in supplier agreements, requiring that contracts include appropriate security provisions based on risk assessments. Your vendor risk assessment procedure provides the foundation for determining what security requirements should be included in different types of vendor agreements.
Auditors examining your vendor risk assessment procedures will look for evidence of systematic risk evaluation, appropriate risk mitigation strategies, and ongoing monitoring of vendor performance. They want to see that vendor risk management is integrated into your broader risk management program rather than operating as an isolated activity.
Building Comprehensive Risk Assessment Frameworks
Risk-Based Vendor Categorization Not all vendors carry the same risk profile. A cloud provider that stores customer data requires different assessment than a catering company that provides lunch services. Develop categorization schemes that help you apply appropriate assessment rigor based on the actual risks involved.
Consider multiple risk factors when categorizing vendors: access to sensitive data, system access levels, business criticality, regulatory compliance requirements, and geographic considerations. A vendor that processes credit card transactions needs more thorough assessment than one that provides office supplies.
Create standardized assessment templates for different vendor categories that ensure consistent evaluation while allowing for customization based on specific circumstances. This approach enables efficient assessment while maintaining thoroughness where it matters most.
Comprehensive Risk Domain Coverage Your assessment procedure should evaluate multiple risk areas that could impact your organization:
Security and Privacy Risks - How does the vendor protect data and systems? What security controls do they have in place? How do they handle security incidents? Do they have appropriate certifications or audit reports?
Operational Risks - How reliable are the vendor's services? What backup and disaster recovery capabilities do they maintain? How do they handle capacity management and performance monitoring?
Financial Stability - Is the vendor financially stable enough to maintain service levels throughout the contract period? What happens to your data and services if the vendor faces financial difficulties?
Compliance and Legal Risks - Does the vendor comply with regulations that apply to your organization? Are they located in jurisdictions with appropriate legal protections? Do they have adequate insurance coverage?
Reputation and Relationship Risks - Does the vendor have a track record of ethical business practices? How do they handle conflicts of interest? What is their approach to customer communication and relationship management?
Multi-Phase Assessment Approach Design assessment procedures that match the depth of evaluation to the complexity and risk level of vendor relationships. Simple, low-risk vendors might need only basic questionnaires, while complex, high-risk relationships might require site visits, detailed documentation review, and ongoing monitoring.
Create assessment phases that build on each other: initial screening to eliminate clearly inappropriate vendors, detailed assessment for serious candidates, and ongoing monitoring for active vendor relationships. This approach ensures thorough evaluation while managing assessment resources efficiently.
Practical Implementation Strategies
Standardized Assessment Tools Develop questionnaires, checklists, and evaluation frameworks that ensure consistent vendor assessment regardless of who conducts the evaluation. Include both quantitative metrics that can be easily compared and qualitative assessments that capture nuanced considerations.
Consider using industry-standard frameworks like the Shared Assessments SIG questionnaire or CAIQ (Consensus Assessments Initiative Questionnaire) as starting points for your assessment tools. These frameworks provide comprehensive coverage while enabling comparison across different vendors.
Documentation and Evidence Requirements Establish clear requirements for what documentation vendors must provide during assessment. This might include security certifications, audit reports, insurance certificates, financial statements, and reference information. Standardize documentation requirements to enable meaningful comparison between vendors.
Create secure methods for vendors to provide sensitive information during assessment. You need enough detail to make informed decisions while protecting vendors' confidential information appropriately.
Cross-Functional Assessment Teams Vendor risk assessment requires input from multiple perspectives - legal, security, procurement, business units, and sometimes technical specialists. Create assessment teams that include relevant expertise while maintaining efficient decision-making processes.
Define clear roles and responsibilities for assessment team members. Who leads the assessment? Who makes final decisions? How are disagreements resolved? Clear governance prevents assessment delays and ensures accountability.
Technology-Enabled Assessment Consider vendor risk management platforms that can streamline assessment workflows, maintain vendor databases, and track ongoing monitoring activities. These tools are particularly valuable for organizations with large vendor populations or complex assessment requirements.
Use automated monitoring services that can provide ongoing intelligence about vendor security incidents, financial changes, or compliance issues. This information helps you identify when reassessment or additional risk mitigation might be needed.
Managing Different Vendor Relationship Types
Cloud Service Providers Cloud vendors often require specialized assessment approaches that address shared responsibility models, data location controls, and service availability guarantees. Focus on understanding exactly what security controls the vendor provides versus what remains your responsibility.
Review vendor security certifications like SOC 2, ISO 27001, or cloud-specific frameworks. However, don't rely solely on certifications - understand how vendor controls apply to your specific use case and data types.
Software Vendors Software vendor assessment should address both the security of the software itself and the vendor's development and support practices. Consider factors like vulnerability management, patch deployment, support responsiveness, and end-of-life planning.
Evaluate whether vendor software requires access to your systems or data, and assess the security implications of any integrations or data sharing requirements.
Professional Services Providers Service providers often need access to sensitive information or systems to perform their work. Assessment should address personnel security, data handling procedures, and project security controls.
Consider the temporary nature of many service relationships and ensure that assessment covers data return, access revocation, and confidentiality obligations that persist after project completion.
Critical Infrastructure and Utilities Vendors that provide essential services like telecommunications, power, or facilities require assessment of their business continuity planning, redundancy capabilities, and emergency response procedures.
Understand your dependencies on these vendors and develop contingency plans for service disruptions that could impact your operations.
Building Effective Vendor Contracts
Risk-Based Contract Requirements Use assessment results to determine what security and performance requirements should be included in vendor contracts. High-risk vendors should face more stringent contractual obligations than low-risk vendors.
Include specific, measurable security requirements rather than vague commitments to "maintain adequate security." Define what adequate means in terms of specific controls, certifications, or performance metrics.
Ongoing Monitoring and Reporting Include contractual requirements for vendors to report security incidents, significant changes to their operations, and compliance status updates. Define what constitutes a reportable incident and establish timeline requirements for notification.
Require vendors to provide evidence of ongoing compliance with security requirements through audit reports, certification maintenance, or periodic self-assessments.
Right to Audit and Inspect Include contractual rights to audit vendor security controls, either directly or through third-party assessments. However, be realistic about when and how these rights will be exercised - most organizations don't have resources to audit all vendors regularly.
Consider accepting third-party audit reports in lieu of conducting your own audits, particularly for vendors with appropriate certifications or industry-standard assessments.
Data Protection and Incident Response Include specific requirements for data protection, breach notification, and incident response coordination. Define vendor responsibilities for detecting, reporting, and responding to security incidents that could affect your data or operations.
Address data ownership, retention, and return requirements explicitly. Ensure that contracts specify what happens to your data when vendor relationships end.
Ongoing Vendor Risk Management
Regular Risk Reassessment Vendor risk profiles change over time due to business evolution, security improvements or degradation, regulatory changes, and external factors. Establish regular reassessment schedules based on vendor risk levels and relationship criticality.
High-risk vendors might need annual reassessment, while low-risk vendors might be reassessed every three years. Include triggers for immediate reassessment when significant changes occur.
Performance Monitoring and Metrics Implement ongoing monitoring of vendor performance against contractual requirements and service level agreements. Track both security metrics and operational performance indicators that could signal emerging risks.
Use vendor performance data to inform contract renewals, relationship modifications, and future vendor selection decisions.
Incident Management and Response Develop procedures for managing security incidents that involve vendors, whether the vendor is the source of the incident or needs to be involved in response activities. Include vendor communication requirements and coordination procedures.
Plan for scenarios where vendor relationships need to be terminated quickly due to security incidents or performance failures. Identify alternative vendors or contingency plans for critical services.
Technology and Automation Opportunities
Vendor Risk Management Platforms Consider specialized software that can automate vendor assessment workflows, maintain risk databases, and provide ongoing monitoring capabilities. These platforms can significantly reduce administrative burden while improving consistency and documentation.
Look for platforms that integrate with your existing procurement and contract management systems to streamline vendor onboarding and lifecycle management.
Automated Risk Intelligence Use third-party services that provide ongoing intelligence about vendor security incidents, financial changes, or compliance status. This information can trigger reassessment activities or additional due diligence without requiring constant manual monitoring.
Consider services that monitor vendor networks for security issues, dark web mentions, or other indicators that might signal emerging risks.
Integration with Business Systems Integrate vendor risk assessment with procurement, contract management, and financial systems to ensure that risk considerations are included in business decisions about vendor relationships.
Create approval workflows that require risk assessment completion before vendor contracts can be executed or renewed.
Common Implementation Challenges
Assessment Scalability Organizations with hundreds of vendors often struggle to conduct thorough risk assessments for all relationships. Prioritize assessment efforts based on actual risk levels rather than trying to assess all vendors equally.
Develop streamlined assessment processes for low-risk vendors while maintaining thorough evaluation for high-risk relationships.
Vendor Assessment Fatigue Vendors increasingly face assessment requests from multiple customers, leading to response fatigue and reduced cooperation. Coordinate with industry peers when possible to reduce duplicative assessment efforts.
Accept industry-standard assessments and certifications when appropriate rather than requiring custom assessments for every vendor relationship.
Resource Constraints Thorough vendor risk assessment requires significant time and expertise that many organizations lack. Consider outsourcing specialized assessment activities or using shared assessment services for complex evaluations.
Train internal staff on assessment techniques and risk evaluation to build organizational capability over time.
Measuring Program Effectiveness
Track metrics that demonstrate whether your vendor risk assessment program is working effectively:
• Assessment completion rates - Are assessments being completed for all appropriate vendor relationships? • Risk identification accuracy - Are assessment processes identifying vendors that later experience security or performance issues? • Incident prevention - Are vendor-related security incidents decreasing over time? • Contract compliance - Are vendors meeting contractual security and performance requirements? • Stakeholder satisfaction - Do business units find the assessment process helpful for vendor selection decisions?
Use this data to continuously improve assessment procedures and demonstrate program value to organizational leadership.
Your vendor risk assessment procedure should evolve from a compliance requirement into a strategic capability that enables better vendor partnerships while protecting organizational interests. When executed effectively, comprehensive vendor risk management reduces security incidents, improves vendor performance, and often identifies opportunities for cost savings and operational improvements. The investment in systematic vendor risk assessment pays dividends in reduced risks, stronger partnerships, and enhanced organizational resilience that supports long-term business success.
Template
1. Document Control
- Document Title: Vendor Risk Assessment Procedure
- Document Identifier:
PRC-ALL-002
- Version Number:
v1.0
- Approval Date:
<24 June 2025>
- Effective Date:
<24 June 2025>
- Review Date:
<24 June 2026>
- Document Owner:
<Vendor Risk Manager>
- Approved By:
<Information Security Governance Committee>
2. Purpose
The purpose of this procedure is to ensure that <Company Name> systematically assesses and manages the security and operational risks posed by third-party vendors and service providers. The procedure is designed to evaluate vendor controls, data handling practices, and contractual safeguards before onboarding and throughout the vendor lifecycle.
This procedure supports compliance with SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria CC9.1 and CC9.2 and ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Controls A.5.19 and A.5.20, ensuring that vendors and partners maintain adequate security and risk management practices commensurate with their level of access to company systems or data.
3. Scope
This procedure applies to all third-party vendors, contractors, consultants, cloud providers, SaaS applications, and service organizations that process, store, transmit, or access <Company Name>’s sensitive data, production systems, or customer information.
It covers all phases of the vendor lifecycle: procurement, onboarding, active engagement, annual review, and offboarding. Internal procurement teams, legal counsel, and business stakeholders are expected to participate in the assessment and monitoring processes.
4. Policy Statement
<Company Name> shall conduct formal risk assessments for all vendors that:
- Have access to confidential, regulated, or proprietary data
- Integrate into production environments
- Handle critical operations or provide infrastructure services
The process shall include:
- Risk Tiering – Vendors are categorized (Low, Medium, High, Critical) based on access and impact level.
- Due Diligence – Each vendor must complete a risk questionnaire (e.g., SIG, CAIQ, custom security survey).
- Documentation Review – Submission of security documentation (SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, pen test reports).
- Contractual Safeguards – Verification of data protection clauses, SLAs, breach notification terms, and audit rights.
- Approval Workflow – Risk ratings and documentation are reviewed by Legal, InfoSec, and Business Owner prior to engagement.
- Ongoing Monitoring – Annual reassessment and event-driven reviews triggered by incidents, breaches, or scope changes.
5. Safeguards
Control ID | Safeguard Description |
---|---|
VRA-01 | All vendors are risk-tiered using a standardized Vendor Impact Matrix. |
VRA-02 | Critical and High vendors must undergo a full security questionnaire review. |
VRA-03 | Required artifacts for high-tier vendors include SOC 2 reports, ISO 27001 certs, and pen test results. |
VRA-04 | Vendor contracts must include information security requirements and right-to-audit clauses. |
VRA-05 | A Vendor Risk Register is maintained in |
VRA-06 | Quarterly review of critical vendors and annual reassessment for all medium+ risk vendors. |
VRA-07 | Vendors with findings must submit a remediation plan and are tracked to resolution. |
VRA-08 | Offboarding checklists ensure secure data destruction and revocation of system access. |
6. Roles and Responsibilities
- Vendor Risk Manager: Oversees the assessment process, maintains the risk register, and coordinates reassessments.
- Procurement Team: Ensures vendors undergo risk review prior to contract execution.
- Business Owner: Defines vendor scope, usage, and confirms business justification.
- Information Security Team: Reviews security documentation, evaluates risks, and recommends mitigation.
- Legal Counsel: Reviews contract terms for security, privacy, liability, and compliance clauses.
- Third-Party Vendor: Provides all required documentation, completes assessments, and complies with <Company Name>’s security standards.
7. Compliance and Exceptions
All vendor engagements must pass risk assessment and obtain documented approval prior to onboarding. Procurement may not finalize contracts for vendors classified as “High” or “Critical” without security review and signed approval.
Exceptions must be documented using the Vendor Risk Exception Form, signed by the Business Owner and approved by the Chief Risk Officer or their delegate. Each exception must include compensating controls and a review date not to exceed 12 months.
8. Enforcement
Failure to comply with this procedure—such as bypassing vendor assessment, ignoring remediation obligations, or using unvetted services—may result in disciplinary action for employees and contract penalties for vendors.
<Company Name> reserves the right to suspend or terminate vendor access upon discovery of significant, unresolved risks or breaches of contractual obligations.
9. Related Policies/Documents
- POL-ALL-015: Vendor Management Policy
- PRC-ALL-001: Risk Assessment Procedure
- POL-ALL-005: Information Security Policy
- ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Controls A.5.19, A.5.20
- SOC 2 Criteria: CC9.1 (Vendor Risk Management), CC9.2 (Contractual Obligations)
- Vendor Risk Tiering Matrix
- Vendor Risk Questionnaire
- Vendor Offboarding Checklist
10. Review and Maintenance
This procedure shall be reviewed annually or upon changes to the third-party risk management program. The Vendor Risk Manager is responsible for initiating and coordinating this review and ensuring that related forms and tools are updated accordingly.